Not clear why some oppose state identity authentication.

admin

It's been long since I thought about whether GA could come up with an unified authentication app for each company, providing them with a single interface to get the success or failure of authentication information, but not any personal information they can obtain. Now it finally came out, and some people reacted fiercely. I don't understand why: after all, all these are required to be real names. Why not just be in the hands of the Ministry of Public Security? Who cares if they are controlled by many, many various moral levels of people? What's more, why only have the Ministry of Public Security control your information? If you used to also control the information of the GA Department, now it has been reduced to fewer intermediaries such as small companies. Isn't this better? After all, the Ministry of Public Security will only find you when certain circumstances arise, while various large and small service providers that hold your information, photos, biometric information, and among some of these companies, there will definitely do something. For capitalists, they are pursuing maximum profits. The most important thing is that they got your information didn't affect the Ministry of Public Security from getting your information. So what kind of opposition does this app make? You should oppose it directly if you really oppose it. In the case where the network identity system cannot be overturned, isn't this app a good thing?